19 Mar 2009, 12:52 AM EDT
|
#1 |
|
Newcomer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
 |
In your dreams
look at my profile!!!!! Best car ever, and it's all mine
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 1:10 AM EDT
|
#2 |
|
Mile High Club
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,475
|
Lol far from it kid, appreciate the humor though, it looks like the Garage has been kind of dull lately.
__________________
U.S. Army! |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 1:12 AM EDT
|
#3 | |
|
Forum Celebrity
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 4,201
|
Looks like you bought a tank like I did.
__________________
 Quote:
My boy with the GVR-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 2:35 AM EDT
|
#4 |
|
Spam Bot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,924
 |
not really kid. and my father in law has one and a trans am ws6..... the challenger is pretty slow actually compared to what it should be. very slow, exhaust tone is non existant. they are nice inside, very spacious and are like sedans, but they are pretty slow.
1. when you have this happen to you in an srt8: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/M...-Ch_194575.htm umm, a challenger shouldnt lose to a lexus is stock for stock. thats just sad (and you dont even have an srt8) 2.you have all kinds of *** stickers on yours, if you have one, you need it to look clean. ex  3. i owned (yes, breaking news, i gave it back to my dad yesterday to finish on his time. its his birthday on st pattys day and he has the time and i dont, as well as i know hes not gonna sell it and is just gonna eventually gonna end back up at me ne ways. i will probably still refer to it as mine. he is just basically the "techinal" owner of it now.) a 70, im sure i would rather have mine than urs, even though mine is purple (i actually like the purple ne ways). 4. i would rather have one of these:  than that orange turd in the first place, the funny thing is, with no matter what v8 you have, the small hemi or big... this one still has a smaller motor, and is WAY faster than ur florescent piece o terd
__________________
 Words of wisdom: If it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast. If it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable. If it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 2:37 AM EDT
|
#5 |
|
Spam Bot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,924
|
i just read that and holly hell grammar police its late. im going to bed.
__________________
Words of wisdom: If it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast. If it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable. If it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 10:33 AM EDT
|
#6 |
|
Forum Nightmare
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,333
|
Take all stickers off and leave the slant front RT ones.
__________________
The only Triumph of Evil is when Good Men stand by and do nothing. |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 6:06 PM EDT
|
#7 |
|
Prime Poster
Join Date: May 2005
Location: wilkes-barre, pa
Posts: 9,534
 |
are the new challenger r/t's any fast artimus? there's this dude in my town with one and he keeps ****in with me every time he sees me, like revvin it up and ****, but i haven't gotten a chance to run him yet. you think i'll stand a chance in the skittle?
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 7:24 PM EDT
|
#8 |
|
Triumphant Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,642
 |
You just have BOV right? They run mid-13s to your high 13s. Is he stock/can drive the thing?
__________________
 .adrenaline SuPAdReN  |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 8:19 PM EDT
|
#9 |
|
Banned 4 Life
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Spring Grove, Pa
Posts: 2,120
|
we no alec cant drive the srt so im gonna say the challenger lolz jk alec
|
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 8:19 PM EDT
|
#10 | |
|
Triumphant Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
__________________
.adrenaline SuPAdReN |
|
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 9:43 PM EDT
|
#11 |
|
Spam Bot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,924
|
dont know if alec can drive it or what he has, but i would maybe give the reg. 5.9 hemi a mid to high 14. i mean, they are quick, but not balsy fast. no ls1 stawk fast. i would even take a stock s/c cobra over one in a race.
__________________
Words of wisdom: If it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast. If it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable. If it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap |
|
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 11:29 PM EDT
|
#12 | |
|
Triumphant Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,642
|
Quote:
__________________
.adrenaline SuPAdReN |
|
|
|
|
|
20 Mar 2009, 12:05 AM EDT
|
#13 |
|
Mile High Club
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,475
|
Yeah the R/T's are running like 13.7's, SRT's like 13.4's. I've ridden in an SRT, nice car and very torqey, but not my style. I bet the 6 spds would be fun, but Idk why anyone would pick one over the new Camaro SS, 6 spds should pull a 12.8-ish. And they will have TONS of potential, mark my word..simple bolt-ons are going to do a lot, car is very detuned from the factory. Intake design is crap, just a CAI should have no problem freeing up 20 hp.
__________________
U.S. Army! |
|
|
|
|
20 Mar 2009, 1:29 AM EDT
|
#14 |
|
Spam Bot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,924
|
exactly, my pop in laws seemed to have the tq there but after the initial first couple k i was like ehh.... bored. looks, dodge mustang then mulletmobile (im sorry but chevy reaaaaaaaaaaaaaly screwed the pooch on this one. it could have looked so much better. their problem is they went away from the origional design and went with the longer sleeker design and now they try to go right back).
performance: new mustangs sadly to say, chevy (mainly bc i think w all the lan bus systems gm is using now a days its gonna make it harder to mod and calibrate.... driving a computer on wheels is never fun, and thats what new gms are as far as their ******ed computers now then dodge. im sorry but this is just sexy: 
__________________
Words of wisdom: If it's cheap & reliable, it ain't fast. If it's fast & cheap, it ain't reliable. If it's fast & reliable, it ain't cheap |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
3v3 Search n Destroy!
3v3 SnD Bash
Linear Mode
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
MLG Mobile App