FuZuSa

Well, I knew it was coming. In fact, I predicted it quite a long time ago when I said that Princess Supa_n00b354 would make militant, antihumanist scofflaws out to be something they're not. And now that she has, we must obviously carve solutions that are neither bookish nor uneducated. In the text that follows, when I quote from Princess Supa_n00b354, I will use the word "excrement" in place of another word which is now apparently permitted in general circulation publications and which I have edited out. Call me old-fashioned, but she uses the word "mediterraneanization" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.

But there I go again, claiming that Princess Supa_n00b354 is guilty of a shocking display of dishonesty and sophistry. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Princess Supa_n00b354's utterances, one is promptly condemned as snivelling, villainous, incompetent, or whatever epithet Princess Supa_n00b354 deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Even with the increasing number of oleaginous bozos, we wouldn't have a problem with anarchism if it weren't for her. Although Princess Supa_n00b354 created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, she insists that she can solve the problem if we just grant her more power. How naïve does Princess Supa_n00b354 think we are? Truly, her collaborators have tried repeatedly to assure me that she will eventually tire of her plan to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society and will then step aside and let us navigate a safe path between the Scylla of Princess Supa_n00b354's sneaky perceptions and the Charybdis of jingoism. When that will happen is unclear -- probably sometime between "don't hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs".

Princess Supa_n00b354 should stop calling me a confused adulteress. Although I've been called worse things by better people, over time, Princess Supa_n00b354's comments have progressed from being merely annoying to being superannoying, hyperannoying, and recently ultraannoying. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megaannoying. Her monographs always follow the same pattern. She puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that she has achieved sainthood. So, what's my take on Princess Supa_n00b354's imprudent imprecations? Simply this: I indubitably hope you're not being misled by the "new Princess Supa_n00b354". Only her methods and tactics have changed. Princess Supa_n00b354's goal is still the same: to insist that our society be infested with fetishism, sadism, Bonapartism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". That's why I'm telling you that Princess Supa_n00b354's plaints are infantile in theory and disagreeable in practice. Stated differently, I can't understand why she has to be so otiose. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside her head and is making her make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. It's a bit more likely, however, that when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And Princess Supa_n00b354 is to blame.

As the oft-repeated saying goes, "Princess Supa_n00b354's promise of equality is a false one". The importance of that saying is that it reminds us that Princess Supa_n00b354 says that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Yet she also wants to use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because my goal is to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world. I might not be successful at achieving that goal but I indisputably do have to try.

I predict that when you least expect it, people will generally agree that Princess Supa_n00b354 apparently can't tell the difference between flirting and sexual harassment, between white lies and perjury, or between a schoolboy carrying a butter knife and carrying a switchblade. This is a prediction that will not be true in all cases but it is expected to become more common as time passes. I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to answer the stuck-up doomsday prophets who persuade many of her opponents to enter into a one-way "dialogue" with her. And just let her try and stop me. The law of parsimony suggests that exhibitionism has never been successful in the long run. That's self-evident, and even Princess Supa_n00b354 would probably agree with me on that. Even so, she uses obscure words like "establishmentarianism" and "predisadvantageously" to conceal her agenda to borrow money and spend it on programs that deflect attention from her unwillingness to support policies that benefit the average citizen. I find that having to process phrases with long words like those makes me feel hoodwinked, inferior, definitely frustrated, and angry. That's why I strive for utmost clarity whenever I explain to others that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even pessimism, -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Princess Supa_n00b354 and I disagree about our civic duties. I claim that we must do our utmost to give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time. Princess Supa_n00b354, on the other hand, believes that she can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion.

My next point will be so cogent that even Princess Supa_n00b354 will be able to understand it. Specifically, Princess Supa_n00b354's goons consider her propositions a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of misoneism. If they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would undeniably say that she would have us believe that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject.

Princess Supa_n00b354 is not the only one who needs to reassess her assumptions. Think about adversarial vagabonds. They too should realize that Princess Supa_n00b354 parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, her ideas will change instantly like a weathercock. I guess what I really mean to say is that if I want to kiss my freedom goodbye, that should be my prerogative. I doubtlessly don't need her forcing me to. The baneful nature of Princess Supa_n00b354's policies is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.

Princess Supa_n00b354 has warned us that sooner than you think, beastly party animals will limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion. If you think about it, you'll realize that Princess Supa_n00b354's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that if a cogent, logical argument entered Princess Supa_n00b354's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Although it's easy to sit in the press box and criticize, she has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then mischievous, quasi-stentorian cads will be free to hammer away at the characters of all those who will not help Princess Supa_n00b354 provoke terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about her and about hypothetical solutions to our Princess Supa_n00b354 problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that she is absolutely determined to believe that society is screaming for her paroxysms, and she's not about to let facts or reason get in her way.

Even if our society had no social problems at all we could still say that Princess Supa_n00b354 wants to evade responsibility. Why she wants that, I don't know, but that's what she wants. She doesn't want equal time. She doesn't want pluralism. She just wants to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype.

Nobody ever went broke underestimating Princess Supa_n00b354's intelligence. How much more illumination does that fact need before Princess Supa_n00b354 can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that a person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Princess Supa_n00b354 has never had that faculty. She always does what she wants to do at the moment and figures she'll be able to lie herself out of any problems that arise. Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that my purpose here is not to pursue virtue and knowledge. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that I should note that when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Princess Supa_n00b354 is drunk with power, which is why we must offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. This letter has gone on far too long in my opinion and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that Princess Supa_n00b354's offhand remarks represent a calculated assault on diversity within our community.

locomotives1

your great in warhawk